| |
|
John
W. Howard, Ph.D. - Editor |
|
|
|
|
BUILDING
A REFERRAL-BASED BUSINESS-OPINION
Take a good look at your client list. Arrange the names
in order of their importance to your success and write
down where their relationships with you began.
It's likely to become apparent very quickly that your
best clients probably originated with a referral. (If
you find few referrals
at the top of your list, you may have even more to gain
by reading further- you're missing valuable
opportunities!)
Now, consider your efforts to acquire new business:
Where do you devote your efforts? Where do you spend
money? It's widely accepted that referral-based business
is the easiest to acquire, is likely to remain loyal and
is most likely to notify you of and allow you to fix a
problem when one arises.
Over the long term, it is the segment of your business
likely to be the most profitable!
These facts are hardly secret. Why, then, do most
businesses fail to maximize their referral
opportunities? They simply do not have a structured,
organized way to gather and capitalize on referrals!
Look at any business magazine. You will see products for
sale that are designed to help you acquire new
business---
marketing tools, advertising design services, mailing
lists and mailing services. Add to the list Internet
marketing ideas, contact management software, training
in sales techniques and workshops on prospecting
methods. Where in all
this are the referral management tools?
Joe Stumpf, the real estate world's guru of referrals,
has built an empire on the base of teaching people to
build referral-based businesses. (You can find him on
the web.) He has even trademarked his mantra, "By
Referral Only™," and sells products promoting his
approach.
His three-day workshops have been credited with
thousands of real estate success stories, but you don't
have to be in real
estate or spend a dime on training to let the power of
referrals help build your business. A few basic
diligently applied practices can make a big difference.
To increase referrals and your new business, follow
these five simple steps:
Take Time To Explain.
Somewhere in the process of introducing our business to
someone new, we tell them we base our business on
referrals and explain why. The key point, and the reason
they will eventually feel they owe us referrals, is
this: Other people who do what we do spend more than
half their time looking for new business, and the
remainder servicing their existing clients. With our
approach,
we can spend 90 percent of our time giving clients
exceptional service as they provide referrals for our
new business.
Ask For Referrals.
This simple, no-cost act is the foundation of
successfully building a referral business. Why don't we
ask? Usually it's because we don't know how or because
we are afraid of imposing. They might say no! Asking is
simple, and done properly will almost always yield one
or more referrals. Reduce the task to a non-threat level
by simplifying your request: "Jim, who else do you know
that we should be talking with?" As the conversation develops, explain
your approach.
Say, "I'm not asking you to call them and tell them we
walk on water. I'd rather just call them myself and be
able to say that Jim
suggested I call because he thought you'd be interested
in what we do."
When you call, say exactly those words. There's no
threat to Jim or his relationship, but you'll be talking
to someone who's listening.
This is the first step to a new business relationship.
Ask Everyone.
One of our best clients came from a referral gained as
we were essentially being "thrown out" of another
prospect's office! When the prospect made it clear our
services were not something of interest to him, our
representative asked on the way to the door, "Well,
then, who do you know that should be talking to us?" Ask
your clients and suppliers, your prospects, your
relatives and friends and people you meet at networking
events. Ask the people who tell you no. You have much to
gain and little to lose.
Ask Repeatedly.
In the six face-to-face meetings leading to a new client
relationship, I asked for referrals each time without
success. It actually became a standing joke, since we
both knew that eventually I would ask. On the seventh
meeting, I walked into the office, and he handed me a
neatly handwritten list with seven names and contact
numbers. He said, "Here are the referrals I owe you!" He
had a smile on his face and I did, too!
Give Referrals.
In the preceding story, I presented the prospect with at
least one referral for his business at each meeting. By
the seventh meeting, it would have been difficult for
him to avoid reciprocating. It's not that hard to
provide others with referrals, and you owe it to
them, as they owe it to you.
And Those Are Five Simple Steps That Can Dramatically
Improve Your Business!
|
|
|
|
WHAT CAN WE DO
ABOUT LOW PERFORMERS?
Every business, despite best efforts in recruiting,
hiring and motivating employees, eventually faces the
problem of consistently
low performers. Tasks get done but seldom on time.
Absenteeism and tardiness creep up. The manager
gradually shifts some
of the workload to other, higher-performing workers.
It's like the slow creep of some deadly disease, with
the whole department or business being silently but
steadily reduced in effectiveness and morale. As the
manager, you wish people like this would just disappear,
but it seems they never do. They just
seem to hang on and on...
In some circles this is labeled "presenteeism," and
having these low performers at work may be costing you
more than if you paid
them to stay home! Top performers, saddled with the
extra load of carrying dead weight, may simply choose to
move on, taking
advantage of the current job market to go somewhere not
requiring them to carry low performers on their back.
Customers who
interact with them think twice before bringing their
business back to your company.
If you have low performers in your operation, and you
think they will eventually go away, think again- they
may have already
outlasted your two predecessors and are planning a party
around your eventual departure!
What can you do, then, to solve this dilemma?
Identify The Problem In Clear, Measurable Terms.
If you've been meaning to set performance standards for
each job in your area, now is the time. Absenteeism,
tardiness, missed productivity levels and timeline
delays could all become part of a set of performance
standards (although you will be well-advised to set
these standards in their more positive polar opposite
verbiage.)
Meet with your low performers, layout the expectations
and the places where performance regularly falls short
and make clear what the specific expectations are for
future performance. Make it clear these expectations
will be tracked and frequently evaluated. Then do just
that-make the consequences of failing to meet these
goals clear and enforceable.
Work Your Plan.
Execution is the key. Follow your scheduled evaluations
of performance with clear feedback. If expectations are
not being met, give the feedback immediately.
While your fondest hope may be to see these people
improve their performance, it's much more likely you are
simply documenting the path to the door. Either way,
timely feedback, action on promised consequences and
consistent application are your key to solving the
problem.
Document Your Process.
Since the odds are highly in favor of the eventual
departure of your low performers, make sure you have
clear documentation
of the entire process, from identification through
consequences.
If performance, after all this effort, falls short of
benchmarks, fire them ! One successful manager said,
"The most expensive
time an employee is on my payroll is the interval
between when I decide to fire them and when they go out
the door."
Because firing someone, especially someone who has been
with the business for a long time, is very painful, you
may find
yourself procrastinating. Your delay at this stage can
only compound the damage.
Following Jack Welch's advice to remove the bottom 10
percent of employees each year is not an easy path, and
you may
differ in your approach to making your business better,
but to ignore a consistently low-performing employee is
to ensure your
operations will never be as good as they could be.
Of course, when it is time to hire a new employee, we
would all like to avoid replicating the departed one!
This is the opportunity
to use a well-structured hiring process, information
from assessments and other sources, background checks
and any other valid
information you can gather to try to add a top performer
to your business.
Studies have shown top performers, in nearly any
business, will out-produce low performers by anywhere
from 200-to-900
percent!
Imagine the effect on your company, if you could replace
one low performer with one top performer.
Then, imagine you did it again and again...
The Good News: You Can! |
|
|
|
|
OPPORTUNITIES FOR REDUCING HIRE FAILURE -APPLYING ASSESSMENT
SELECTION CRITERION
A relatively large medical practice has used the StepOne Survey
II™ in its selection process for nearly two years. Recently, the
practice shifted its attention to what was perceived as an
unacceptable level of early hire failures (27 percent of new
hires failing
in 180 days or less. )
The company enjoys "preferred employer" status in its market and
has continued to have a high number of applicants, even as
unemployment has declined.
Historically, the practice has used the results of the
assessment to influence the hiring decision.
(Average scale scores are appreciably different between the
groups of applicants who were hired and those who were not
hired.)
It is also clear they have not applied consistent criteria to
the scale scores by eliminating applicants below criteria
levels. (Several
hired applicants had one or more very low scale scores on the
assessment.)
The data was analyzed for the possible effects of applying
different criterion levels to the scores. Criterion 1 was
calculated as if
no applicants had been hired with any scale score of 3 or less.
Criterion 2 was calculated as if no applicants had been hired
with any scale score of 4 or less. As the graph shows, applying
either criterion would result in a dramatic decrease in the rate
of early hire failures. Criterion 1 would reduce the rate from
27 percent to 21 percent, while only reducing the percentage of
hires working beyond 180 days by 5 percent and the applicant
pool by a mere 1 percent.
Criterion 2 would further reduce the failures to 17 percent but
would reduce the percentage of hires working beyond 180 days
by 27 percent, a level that may be unacceptably high. The
statistics provide a job-related basis for adopting Criterion 1
and should
be more defensible than the current, less-structured approach.
To further reduce the percentage of early failures and provide
the increased productivity effects usually associated with
improved
job fit, the company may well benefit from adopting a job fit
assessment for finalists for these positions.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'Management' means in the
last analysis, the substitution of thought for brawn and
muscle... --Peter Drucker |
|
|
|
|
|
|