| KEEPING YOUR BEST — HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR ODDS |
| The official statistics are confusing, and more
experts are challenging the government’s methods of
calculating unemployment, but overall unemployment is
clearly trending down. As the job market swings toward
increasing scarcity of qualified applicants, a parallel
trend begins to appear: top performers in every sector
of the economy start to change jobs, looking for better
pay, more recognition, opportunity for advancement, or
perhaps just a change. Ask yourself these questions
about your people:
- Who is most likely to look for outside
opportunities?
- Who finds it easiest to get a different job?
- Who would I miss most, if they quit?
- Whose loss would hurt me most, in our competitive
field?
- Who is my competition trying to recruit?
Chances are, the answer to all of these questions is
exactly the same: “Our best.”
If your company has been struggling to remain
profitable for these past few difficult years, or just
struggling to stay alive, you have probably tried to cut
costs, delay raises, run lean, and expected more from
every worker, especially from your best. They may, by
now, feel underpaid and underappreciated, adding to the
pressures to look around for a better deal.
Estimates of the cost to replace a top performing
employee vary, from their annual salary to as much as
four times that number. It’s time to reappraise your
practices, and be sure you are doing everything you can
to keep your best employees. There’s almost no other
place in your business with the opportunity to reap as
much return on your investment!
What can you do to retain your best people?
Identify them: Too many businesses do not really know
who their best people are. Use measurable, objective
criteria to identify your top performers. The old saw
about not being able to manage what you don’t measure
applies here, in spades!
Learn what makes them “the best”: Characteristics of
top performers can be measured and recorded. If you know
those characteristics, you can look for new people to
become your best, you can focus on keeping your best,
and you can bank the information to help guide your
future actions.
Recognize and reward their performance: While money
can be important, in most studies it comes in fourth or
fifth in importance when compared to recognition, simple
thanks, job satisfaction, opportunity to advance, and
other “soft” variables.
Give them a path to follow for promotion: If you know
the characteristics of your best people, and the
characteristics required to succeed in the positions in
your business, you can design individual career paths to
keep your best people with you, while improving your
profitability.
Avoid the “Peter Principle”: Few mistakes in business
are as costly as over promotion. Usually, our former top
performer (promoted to the point of failure) cannot
succeed at the new job and cannot go back to the old
job. We lose them to our competition, where they become
a top performer again—doing their old job!
It takes thought, planning, measurement and
investment to keep your best — but it pays! |
|
WHEN GOOD APPLICANTS ARE SCARCE,
REACH FURTHER
SELECT FOR FIT, TRAIN FOR SKILLS-
OPINION, BY JOHN W.
HOWARD, PH.D.
|
| In F. Leigh Branham’s book, "Keeping the
People Who Keep You in Business", he makes this
suggestion; “Interview applicants who may lack
traditional qualifications, such as degrees or years of
experience, but have the right abilities and
can be trained…” (emphasis added).
If an employee has the right abilities, training for
specific job skills can become efficient and profitable.
Absent those right abilities, no amount of training is
likely to produce a top performer, and even a high level
of skill will not keep him/her on the job.
Our egalitarian underpinnings continue to cost
American businesses billions of dollars, as we pursue
the failed notion, “we can train anyone to do anything.”
We know they don’t have wings, but we send pigs to
flying school every day. We even subsidize their flight
schools with tax dollars!
If a business will discipline its selection for
training process, devoting just 10 percent of the money
usually budgeted for training to assessing before
training, the payoff will be very gratifying. |
|
Selecting employees with the right
characteristics, then providing training, will produce a
high number of top performers who fit their jobs, enjoy
their work, and produce profits for their employer. If
we continue to focus on training without first
identifying the characteristics necessary for success,
we will continue to produce workers who have learned the
skills but cannot perform at a high level, will not
enjoy the work, will not remain on the job over time,
and who will not produce profits.
Pigs, by the way, may never be good fliers...but they
can run quite well. Train your pigs to run, and send
eagles to your flight schools. In both cases, you can
produce top performers, and your profits will reflect
your good business practices! |
|
| BUILD YOUR RETENTION LIBRARY—A
WEALTH OF IDEAS
|
| In a salute to the importance of the
topic of employee retention, you can find shelves of
recent books on approaches to this challenge. Three of
the best are reviewed briefly here. All contain
practical ideas and tools to apply to your unique
opportunities and goals:
"Keeping the People Who Keep You in Business" (Leigh
Braham) —
Provides a very specific and complete set of retention
practices, organized around attracting, selecting,
integrating, and coaching your people. He offers real
examples of these principles at work, and points out
that “reducing turnover takes commitment.” Common sense
ideas are presented in a practical and inspiring manner.
"Keeping Good People" (Roger E. Herman) —
A noted futurist with several major and accurate
predictions of workforce trends to his credit, Herman
believes job changing will continue to increase
throughout the workforce, and businesses must counter
the trend, if they wish to retain their best people. |
|
The author identifies five principal
reasons why employees leave their jobs. He offers nearly
200 practical ways to head off turnover. "Here Today,
Here Tomorrow" (Gregory P. Smith) —
Well-written and easy to read, Smith’s approach is
practical and understandable. Some of his ideas may
sound foolish, and some may seem prohibitively
expensive. But he offers evidence that they work and are
ultimately cost-effective.
Add these books to your resource base. Use
assessments to select, match, and improve your decisions
and better retention can be your reward! |
|
| STRATEGIC HIRING SYSTEM PAYS OFF IN
RESERVATIONS CALL CENTER |
| A major hotel management firm operates a
reservations call center with a primary mission of
customer service, and a secondary sales function. The
call center experiences wide seasonal workload
fluctuations, and has traditionally begun a major round
of hiring each winter. Both performance and turnover
have presented challenges in this environment. In 2003,
reservations agents hired in the winter campaign had
only a 27 percent chance of remaining on the job beyond
June 30. This required additional and continued hiring
efforts through the spring and summer seasons—times of
year that present additional hiring challenges in their
employment market.
In midwinter, by contrast, the company had an
abundance of applicants for their open positions.
The challenge: Design and implement a strategic
hiring system, with the goal of increasing retention and
reducing the necessity of additional hiring through the
spring and summer.
The chosen system was a two-stage strategic system
beginning with a low-cost honesty-integrity measure (the
Step One Survey, or SOS). Once a candidate was screened
into the finalist pool, a targeted job-fit measure was
used to predict the probability of success (the Customer
Service Perspective, or CSP).
Because the company enjoyed a large applicant pool
for the available openings (roughly 10 applicants were
screened for each person hired), they chose a relatively
high criterion for the SOS scores, seeking to consider
only the top 35 percent for inclusion in the finalist
pool.
For the job fit analysis of the finalists, call
center managers chose five Top Performers, and a success
pattern was constructed, using the Customer Service
Perspective assessment. (for details of this analysis,
see Vol. 1 Issue #6 of this newsletter.) Finalists took
the CSP, and were matched to the Top Performer pattern.
Candidates who matched at less than the 70 percent level
were not considered further for employment. Scores of 70
percent or better included the finalist in the interview
process, using the CSP interview guide in the decision
process.
Results of this process are summarized in the graph
below. Overall, retention beyond June 30 increased from
27 percent to 58 percent with use of the strategic
hiring system. Results were even more striking in the
area of involuntary terminations; a reduction from 31
percent to only 17 percent involuntarily terminated in
the study period. As shown in the chart below, the
program has proved to be very cost-effective.

Costs and Benefits:
Prior to implementation of the system, the employer
had estimated the cost per turnover in the
reservations center at $4,500. Using this estimate,
and the actual cost of use of the assessments, the
return on investment of the entire program
(including preliminary pattern-building and
analysis) was better than $5.45 returned for every
dollar invested. Given the even higher costs
associated with firings, the true ROI was probably
much higher.
|
|
|
"Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you
just sit there."
~ Will Rogers
|